Michael O'Blogger

The Official Blog of MichaelOConnell.com

Sunday, May 25, 2008

The Indy 4 Review

Remember what I said in a previous post about spoilers, kids? This applies here! There are spoilers galore in store! This is NOT a spoiler-free review! So warning you ahead of time…if you have NOT seen “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull”, then do NOT read further! First, because I’m giving stuff away, and second, because you should never read a full review of a film before you go see it anyway! So if you want to read this, go see the film first, then drop on back by!


Spoilers ahead.

Yes, I said spoilers.

Spoilers below, matey! Arrrr!

Don’t you remember you warned me of spoilers, baby (Da da da…)?

If I had a spoiler…I’d spoil it in the mo-or-ning…

Pour…some…spoilers on maaay…


We’re clear on the spoiler thing now, right?

Good! On with the review!

So I made it out with a few friends to the film this evening, as planned. Our showing wasn’t sold out, but was very full, which was cool. We were at the Century theater on Ethan, which provides, as ever, crappy wheelchair seating, so I was off to the side seeing everything kind of stretched out. This is nothing new, so it didn’t really bother me, it’s just something I’m now noticing more since I started taking the occasional drive up to El Dorado Hills to go the beautiful stadium theater there, where if you’re there in a wheelchair, you’ve always got the best seat in house. But, neither here nor there. The movie itself is our topic of discussion.

So as to the movie, after so much stressing over it and speculation and worry, wondering if one of my favorite franchises of all time was going to be ruined by latter-day Lucas and (somehow still Lucas’ bitch after all these years) Spielberg, I have seen it, and can definitely tell you that “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull” is a

BIG STEAMING
PILE OF #$%@!!!

Was that too vague?

As you can tell, right now, just home from the theater, I’ve got some pretty strong feelings about it. In short, that very first review that hit the internet, over on Ain’t It Cool News, that said “this is the Indiana Jones movie you’ve been dreading” turned out, despite what quite a number of apparently over-medicated movie reviewers have thought since, to be 100% correct. All my fears (and even a few I hadn’t thought of) came true. Wow. Part of me is angered, but another part of is almost impressed. You really have to go miles out of your way to blow something on this scale. That almost made the price of my ticket worth it, just to see that feat accomplished myself.

Part of me knew, from the opening sixty seconds of the movie, that it was doomed. We open up, as with all Indy films, on the Paramount logo, and the mountain on it dissolves into some kind of actual mountain. This time was no different. It dissolved into what looked like a mountain, but you quickly realize is a dirt mound. Okay, some possible humor there, throwing a little unexpected at you. And then the mound starts to come apart, and a CGI groundhog pops up.

I’m not joking.

A CGI groundhog.

The poor groundhog then ducks back down (ha ha!) as a hopped-up roadster runs over the mound as an Elvis tune is playing, and we see some teens racing along through the desert, raising a ruckus and being all rebellious and such. This was the narrative way to let us know, in case we didn’t hear going in, that it was now the 1950s in the Indyverse. Yeah, okay, fine. This is also the part where you’re supposed to go, “Hey, it’s like American Graffiti! And George Lucas made American Graffiti! It’s an homage! Get it?!”. Good idea. Remind us of a time when Lucas HAD talent and wasn’t a disconnected, senile mouth-breather.

FYI, the computer ground hogs make two more appearances for the sake of “humor” in the opening sequence.

The wacky teens in the car race past an Army convoy made up of a car, a few trucks and a bunch of soldiers. We see, soon, that this convoy is headed to a military base out there in the desert. The convoy is stopped at the gate by the personnel stationed there, and are told there’s testing going on, and no one is allowed in. A little tension sets in…what’s going on in there? Are these guards on the up-and-up, or is something funky happening here? Suddenly, the soldiers on the trucks we’ve been following whip out their machine guns and gun down all those guards, and we quickly find out what we thought were U.S. soldiers are actually Soviet spies. Okay. Nice twist. I had a little hope there for a moment.

I think that was the last moment in the film. Seriously.

As the convoy heads in and stops in front of a (big) warehouse, the lead car’s trunk is opened, and a couple of obviously reluctant passengers are pulled out. One, we don’t know. The second is our boy, Indy. Okay, NOW I was ready. Harrison was going to start making this movie work for me. Dr. Jones in the HOUSE! I was sort of hoping to be in the theater with the kind of crowd that started cheering when he appeared, but apparently the 8:15 crowd isn’t that demonstrative. That was fine. I waited to see where the film was going next.

The word that sums it up is “downhill”.

Harrison Ford begins to speak. This was disturbing problem number one. If you’re not familiar with the film term “looping”, this is where the actors go back, later, and re-dub their own dialogue. Those recordings made on the set, or on location, aren’t great. Actors go into the recording studio, watching their scene on the screen, and speak their dialogue again, trying to match it up with how their lips are moving in the film. I don’t know if it was bad filmmaking in this case, or if Harrison just stinks at the process, but his looping the first fifteen or more minutes of the film was horrible! I thought I was watching a Godzilla movie for a minute there. It was so bad that for a minute I thought they were dubbing someone else’s voice over Harrison’s performance for some reason. Way to take me right out of the film.

The second problem was the scene itself, outside a warehouse with the desert behind them. I realized, as Cate Blanchett came walking into the scene, that something was odd and not quite real about the lighting. And then it hit me. There were NOT in the desert. This was green screen work! They were on a freaking soundstage somewhere and were being digitally placed in the desert like they were on freaking Coruscant! Are you KIDDING me? We can’t even go to actual LOCATIONS anymore?

And the third problem came up when Blanchett suddenly started trying to use her psychic powers to read Indy’s mind.

Again…not joking.

As Indy is coerced by the Soviets who have him at gunpoint to go inside this warehouse to find a crate they’re looking for, I started to cringe…and was justified. Yes, this was the warehouse from the end of Raiders. Are…you…kidding me? That location, and that scene, should never have been touched again. And yet, here we were. Indy ends up finding the crate for them – which contains (back in not joking mode) a mummified body of an alien – and then tries to make his escape, leading to a big chase through the giant warehouse. And the final big dump taken on the memory of the first film is when they’re racing by some crates in the truck chase and hit one, and part of it breaks off, letting us see, for a moment, that it’s the Ark of the Covenant inside! Ha ha! Shoot me, shoot me, SHOOT ME.

I’ll gloss over what happens next by just saying that, before we get on to the actual film, Indy ends up in mock town in the middle of the desert where a nuclear bomb is about to go off nearby, and he survives by closing himself in a refrigerator. As the town is blown apart, the fridge goes flying and bouncing across the desert, and when it stops, Indy falls out, unharmed…and finds himself face to face with the last of the CGI groundhogs. Sigh. I’m sorry, I meant “Ha ha!”.

Taken into custody by the FBI, Indy, because he was kidnapped by Soviets and forced to take them into the warehouse, is now seen as a possible Red. This, despite the fact that, as we find out in that scene, sometime after Last Crusade he joined the Army, made his way up to Colonel, and was instrumental in spying on the Reds. We cut back to Indy teaching at his college, and soon find out that he’s been fired due to this FBI investigation (blacklisted! Zoinks!). A scene in his home after this tells us that Sean Connery’s Henry Jones Sr. has recently passed, so I guess he’s definitely out of the franchise. Indy decides to go off somewhere, and is just taking off on a train when Shia LaBeouf shows up on his motorcycle looking for him. Why? Because his (stepfather? I never quite figured out the relationship) has been kidnapped in the jungle somewhere. Oh, he also mentions that his mother has been kidnapped, too, but she got away and sent him a letter telling him to go find Jones and give him something (stepfather?) drew. He mentions now that Mom is on the run again, but doesn’t seem all that bothered by that fact. This all leads to Indy and this kid, “Mutt Williams” (wasn’t that the producer for Def Leppard?), taking off (after being chased by more free-roaming Soviets with guns in America) to find some answers. Oh, and “Mutt’s” Mom? Her name is Marion. But because her last name is Williams, Indy seems unable to figure out which “Marion” this might be. Apparently, he’s known many of them. Okay…

What follows is a drawn-out investigation and search for clues that gets increasingly silly. There’s a great moment where they’re in the cell that the missing archeologist (the maybe-stepfather, but I don’t think that’s right) and they’re looking at some figures and writings that he must have “scratched” into the stone walls and floor. These deep and clear “scratchings” could not have been made without a hammer and chisel and a hell of a lot of time. They get their clues, they face some danger, the end up captured, and they find not only the archaeologist (John Hurt, whose character is now completely insane) and the magical crystal skull, but the big reveal happens with Marion (Oh! THAT Marion!). More silliness leads to a big escape, which leads to a quicksand moment where Marion reveals to Indy that Mutt is his son, and then they’re captured again. But escape again! An escape that involves LOADS of ridiculous CGI use, a horrible Tarzan scene with Mutt swinging through the jungle (and somehow making allies of monkeys, who kindly attack the evil Russian dominatrix, because these are free market monkeys, damnit!), a chase by flesh-eating ants and not one but THREE unsurvivable waterfall drops that our heroes make it through just swell.

The finale takes place in the temple they discover, where they’re menaced by zombie Mayan warriors (?) and find the big chamber with thirteen crystal skeletons on thrones (one missing a head – the one that they’ve brought back). We find out that these aliens are the ones who visited this ancient people and brought them irrigation and other such stuff that was hundreds of years ahead of them. When the skull is placed on the final skeleton, it COMES TO LIFE. Cate Blanchett wants all its knowledge and starts having some psychic pow-wow with it (did I mention that the Soviets were looking for this place so they could get vast telepathic powers and take over America and the rest of the world?). There is a moment in the middle of this scene that I SWEAR I am not making up. Indiana Jones actually stops and says “I’ve got a bad feeling about this”. While I’ve had many reasons to want to punch George Lucas in his bearded face in the past decade, never has the urge been so strong.

I’m at a loss to properly describe how it all ends, but Cate gets all the knowledge but is inexplicably killed for it, and a big (wait for it) FLYING SAUCER rises up from beneath the temple, destroying it, and our heroes make it out just in time before the saucer goes not off into space, but back to the other DIMENSION that it’s from. As the once-more-sane John Hurt tells us, they’re not spacemen, but extra-dimensional creatures. Guess they were just waiting for some helpful soul to return one of their group’s head to them so they could zoom back home.

If this all sounds like I’m pulling your leg, I wish it was so. The film ends with the long-awaited wedding of Indy and Marion. As they’re getting ready to leave the church, a wind blows the doors open, and blows Indy’s fedora off a rack and sends it rolling to Mutt’s feet. Mutt picks it up and starts to put it on – but as Indy and his bride walk by, Indy grabs it, with a grin, and puts it on his own head. Ooh, a portent of a new series of Mutt Williams movies?! Don’t tease me!!

We know, now, the story behind the development of this film, and how it’s been in the works for over ten years, and WHY it took ten years. I read the AP story on this last weekend. Apparently, George’s whole idea – one that he had someone write a screenplay for – was “Indiana Jones and the Saucer Men from Mars”. Yet ANOTHER thing that sounds like I’m making it up, but I’m not. That was the actual title. And this film involved Martians vs. Russians and Americans, right down to a big air battle with U.S. and Soviet jets vs. the saucers. For ten years we haven’t gotten a fourth Indy film because George, Steven and Harrison couldn’t agree on a story that all worked for them. What that translates to is that poor Spielberg and Ford WANTED to make a new Indy film, but had to get one horrifying idea after another handed to them by George – who, if you hadn’t picked up on this yet, is now insane.

Can you just imagine that first pitch lunch? They all head out to Skywalker Ranch. They sit down for lunch together, all in high spirits now that they’ve decided they’re going to make another Jones adventure. Steven and Harrison, all pumped and ready to go, ask George the details of the story he’s been working on. George, grinning proudly, pulls out his spiral notebook, opens to a page that, for some reason his lunch companions can’t quite fathom, has a crudely drawn flying saucer on it, and lays it all out for them. Can you imagine them staring at him, wondering if this is some kind of prank and Ashton Kutcher or Johnny Knoxville is going to spring out of the bushes laughing? Can you imagine the glances of disbelief they carefully slide to each other while George pulls out sketches of the menacing (yet lovable and wacky!) Martians he had his art team come up with? These three men, who have all done such amazing things in film, are not just artists and businessmen, but are good friends. I think we’ve all had one of those moments when a friend of ours is excitedly telling us about some great idea they have, and we KNOW it’s actually a horrible idea, but we really don’t want to hurt their feelings and tell them so? I’m sure friends of mine have been through that with me and my ideas, too. This was the position Steve and Harry found themselves in with their old buddy George.

Try to imagine the final meeting before they went forward with this film. A teleconference, maybe, with an emotionally exhausted Spielberg sighing and staring down at the lengthy list of all the different ideas George has pitched them over the past decade.

“Okay, George. We’re willing to concede on the Martians and the saucer. But no, we can’t work in the Loch Ness monster. And you can’t use Frankenstein. The whole musical number with Indy tap dancing on the Great Wall of China? It’s just not workable. The talking camel? Interesting, don’t get me wrong, but…just not going to work. Same with the giant robot. The thing with Jar Jar stowing away on a saucer bound for Earth and teaming up with Indy? A little too…problematic. Indiana’s lost twin sister, “North Dakota”? No. That leaves us with animated groundhogs, a nuclear explosion, psychic Russians, the Tarzan scene with the capitalist monkeys, the thing with Marion driving their car off a cliff onto a tree that safely lowers them down to the river…” (Steven pauses here and closes his eyes in pain and resignation). “…your Star Wars ‘bad feeling’ line, a sword fight going on between two cars speeding through the jungle, the carnivorous piranha ants, the idea that the heroes can essentially go over Niagara Falls three times in a row and be just fine, and the big portal to another dimension that is apparently set to open up and kill anyone who does the Martians the favor of bringing the skull back to them. If we can just finally agree on all that, then let’s just get started and get this thing over with.”

What is it about George Lucas that makes us all apologists for him and desperate to not hurt his feelings? Hey, I’ve been there. I went into denial and defended Episode I for quite some time. I’m a huge Star Wars fan, and I’m grateful to him for setting it in motion. But at some point do we have to admit that he’s completely lost it – “it”, and his grasp of reality? If someone doesn’t tell him, then all we can do is count the days until – and pray for – the day he retires and lets the new generation of talented (and sane) creators out there whose imaginations he sparked take the reigns and carry his properties to the next level. Nothing’s ever going to change if we keep coddling him, and rewarding him for horrible, idiotic creations, an act that assures that he’ll continue to disappoint and insult fans of beloved properties like Indiana Jones. Yes, Spielberg directed “Crystal Skull”. But I don’t blame him, except for the fact that he didn’t stand up for the Indy fans of the world and keep this mess from happening. The direction of the film itself – along with Harrison’s performance – felt like it was forced, like it was done reluctantly, like he knew what was happening but felt powerless to do anything about it. George’s complete disinterest in characters and story integrity over “neat-o” ideas he can get his ILM folks to pull off was all over this mess of a movie. And his Kool-Aid-swigging fans are all over the message boards, attacking anyone who dares question him, telling us all that there’s something wrong with us if we don’t actively lower our expectations and force ourselves to find the good in this film. Why should I have to LOWER my expectations for a tested franchise being handled by the same people that created it – brilliantly – in the first place? Their desperation for me to “shut up and like it” is completely self-defeating. Is their great fear that if we offend George he’ll take his whip and his stormtroopers and go home? Is it worth continuing to get Star Wars and Indy films, just to have them, if they’re terrible and leave us all feeling empty and – for many of us – angry and betrayed? I was a huge fan of the show “Millennium”. Its second season was one of the most amazing things I’ve ever seen on television. But when it was about to be canceled, the network allowed a third season if numerous changes would be made. Those changes made the show nothing like it had been before, made it completely horrible, and while I own the first two seasons on DVD, I refuse to buy, or ever watch again, the final season. Does this make me a bad fan? Am I supposed to accept some horrible abomination just for the sake of having more Millennium? Better that it HAD just been canceled, and us fans left with the good memories, than to have to have been force-fed a hollow and sub-par final season. And if this is the best we could expect of a new Indiana Jones movie, then the franchise was better left resting in peace.

I honestly went into “Crystal Skull” prepared to cut it huge slack (which apparently you’re required to do) and “just have fun”. I just couldn’t pull it off. Apparently, I have a different idea of “fun” than many people. Bad stories are not fun. Bad acting is not fun. Ridiculous situations that take you right out of the film are not fun. I cannot be mesmerized by green screens and animated monkeys and Shia taking tree branches in the nutsack while straddling between two speeding Russian vehicles. All I really wanted was for this movie to at least FEEL like an Indiana Jones movie, to see the famed character in action again. I didn’t get that character. I got the same actor, in the same outfit, but this was not Indiana Jones. That was not Marion. These were insults to the memory of those beloved characters, now forced to speak and act to serve the effects, not the story. They were there to deliver gags, nothing more. They were the animated corpses of these characters, forced by some Lucas-cast voodoo spell to crawl out of the grave and dance for his amusement. I, for one, was not amused.

I really hope you heeded my warning and didn’t read this if you haven’t seen the film, because I really do want you to make up your own mind. If a swinging Shia and a flying, refrigerator-entombed Indy bring you pleasure, then I hope you get your enjoyment from your summer movie dollar. I realize that my concerns may well not be yours, and if you walk away feeling like you had a great ride and find yourself fulfilled, I envy you, and I’m happy for you. Me? I feel dirty. I feel used. I feel cheated. I feel insulted. I want Spielberg to rush out and make me another “Private Ryan” or “Shindler’s List” to wipe away my memory of his involvement in this as quickly as possible. He’s better than this. I need to be reminded of that. And I need George Lucas to have a moment of clarity, somehow, and retire to his ranch and delegate his empire to people who are ready and willing to take up the mantle and show him what can happen when hungry young minds with fresh ideas are allowed to carry on the dreams he planted in all of us. I will, if that happens, be doubly grateful to him. Until then, I will continue to call him on it whenever he passes some new pile of mind-numbing soulless crap onto us, regardless of the danger I put myself in from rabid Lucasites who do Lord George’s bidding and will want me frozen in carbonite so I’ll stop voicing their secret fears. They’re out there, already starting to write their Mutt Williams fan fiction, continuing to cheer the master on. Only a master of garbage, folks. Only a master of garbage.


Saturday, May 24, 2008

"Handlebars" - The OConnellMD Remix

Okay, if you don't know the Flobots song, then this won't make a lot of sense to you. Even if you know it, perhaps it might behoove you to head to iTunes (my friend Tony paid me a quarter to plug that) and do a search under "Flobots" and find the song "Handlebars" before getting into this. I just got to listening to this song on the radio one day and started thinking that we all probably all have our own rap album in us somewhere. That would be the true album of "us", as most music speaks in abstracts and metaphors and universal ideas, where rap is unabashedly self-centered, self-involved and self-glorifying. Much like blogging...just with more bitches and hos and such. So if, like many celebrities, we all feel we deserve our own rap album (Sacramento Kings fans...you MUST find Chris Webber's rap album online one day. It'll slay you), what would yours sound like? Mine might start something like this (if I just sampled Flobots completely and just rewrote the lyrics). If you don't know the song, don't blame me if the pentameter looks funky and occasionally senseless to you. They wrote it that way. I just wrote over it. Word.

My wheelchair’s like a bike with no handlebars
No handlebars
No handlebars
My wheelchair’s like a bike with no handlebars
No handlebars
No handlebars
Look at me, look at me
Hands on the keys and my mind is free
I write
Like I’m a famous blogger
Maybe not famous but I’m apt to be
I can tell you what’s on my mind
I can tell you what I think’s important
I can blow your brain when I blog you blind
And I can hip your ass to the signs and portents
I can build a web page on the fly
And I can tell you mom jokes ‘til you cry
I know every scene in “Private Ryan”
And I’m not sure I get “Vanilla Sky”
My friend Tim’s art is off the hook
Me and my friend made a comic book
And guess how long it took?
Hey, we got day jobs, give us a break, so, look
I can pay claims if it’s a total loss
A total loss
A total loss
And I could hook you up but I’m not the boss
But I’m not the boss
But I’m not the boss
Look at me, look at me
Like Casanova with Dystrophy
Alive
So screw the doctors
They all guessed wrong we can all agree
I can write novels or a book of essays
I can get rejected by a magazine
I can divine a screenplay one hundred million box on its openin’ day
I can tell you why I’m a Browncoat
I can keep your secrets on the down-low, your business
I know how to keep it sacred
And I can show you how to hit the high notes
Stogies, Firefly and the Guinness
Me and my friends serve it up like tennis
I got a pacemaker keeping rhythm
I don’t got the dollars but I’m gonna get ‘em
‘Cause I can start a movement with no microphone
With no microphone
With no microphone
And I can plant a part of me inside of you
Me inside of you
Me inside of you
Look at me, look at me
Driving and I won’t stop
And I’m going to drive this flaming van ‘til I drop
My faith is solid
My power is sure
My game, I got it
My mind is the cure
I can rise to the top like Tony Robbins
And turn your ass on like Jackie Collins
Speak to your soul ‘til I leave you bawlin
Reach for your hand when I see you fallin
I can do anything I set my sights on
Just because I believe it
My future’s like Broadway with all the lights on
I planned my orbit and I’ll achieve it
‘Cause I’m above the world like a satellite
A satellite
A satellite
And I can sell you tickets to the promised land
To the promised land
To the promised land
And I can make it happen ‘cause it’s how I roll
‘Cause it’s how I roll
‘Cause it’s how I roll
‘Cause it’s how I roll
‘Cause it’s how I roll
‘Cause it’s how I roll
My wheelchair’s like a bike with no handlebars
No handlebars
No handlebars
My wheelchair’s like a bike with no handlebars
No handlebars
No handlebars

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Indy Saturday Night!!

All right, the wait is over! Well...almost. If you're planning to crack that whip with the SacFilmFan gang, then you only have to wait until this Saturday night, May 24, to see "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull". As usual, we will be going to the Century theater on Ethan and Arden, and for the big Indy fest will be attending the 8:15 show.

Good news is? After my previous obsessive hand-wringing on the night before the Cannes showing, the reviews are in - up to 122 of them, last time I checked the 'Meter, and the results are good. Whew! Sure sounds like a film that needs to be seen on the big screen, and with a big crowd.

So join our crowd! Remember - this is another big one, so BUY TICKETS EARLY. Remember, those of us who were at Iron Man, how wall-to-wall THAT was? I always advise Fandango.com. And remember to PRINT the ticket at home and take it with you, or a soon-to-be high-school dropout in a vest with a nametag will stare at you dumbly and won't know what to do...and in the end, will not give you a ticket. Trust me.

I have, just this evening, jumped on iTunes and downloaded the main Indiana Jones theme, just to play it at strategic moments between now and Saturday. So get in the spirit with me. I Don't think Harrison will be doing another one of these, so this is your last chance to see him in the fedora. Come experience with us. Be there!

Sunday, May 18, 2008

John Adams

I’d been excited when I first heard that Tom Hanks’ production company was back in the game with HBO, and putting out a new mini-series based on the life of John Adams. Not only do I consider “From the Earth to the Moon” and “Band of Brothers” to be two of the best things to ever hit television, but when I found out the Paul Giamatti, one of my favorite actors, was cast in the lead of this new Playtone project, I was sold. I was excited, but I’m also pretty busy…so I managed to miss it when it came on. It came back on my radar a few days ago, though, and I remembered that I was going to check and see if it was on On Demand for viewing. Turns out it was, but was only going to be available through 5/19. So I figured I should take the chance to jump on it now instead of clogging up my Netlix list later, and the added time constraint motivated me to try it out.

The series itself was extraordinary, and any award Giamatti DOESN’T receive for this will be a great injustice. I can’t remember the last time I saw such a brilliantly layered performance. And Laura Linney, as Abigail Adams, deserves much of the same praise. I hadn’t thought much about her in years, until I recently rediscovered her in “The Savages”, and she’s became a remarkable actress. Maybe she always was, and I had just never noticed. Also, seeing one of my favorite actors of all time, David Morse, showing up, to my surprise, as George Washington was an incredible treat. The first two or three episodes had me completely mesmerized. The rest affected me similarly, but it’s at this point where I’m not sure how strongly I can gauge how other people will feel about sitting through seven episodes of it, as it is anything but action-packed. Lots of talking, lots of character stuff, but the point of this thing was, after all, to focus on the life of Adams, not American history in general. I found that I wanted to see more focus on the big events, that often just seemed to be happening in the background, but again, this was Adams’ story. I loved all of it, myself, but you’ll have to make up your own mind on whether so much character exposition is your thing. It definitely was mine.

But more than the series and its quality, I think I’m even more floored on the subject matter itself making it to television. Watching that first episode had a very emotional affect on me – because it reminded me how little of this very important part of our national history ever makes it into our media in this day and age. When I was a kid, I remember watching Walt Disney Presents, and I learned a lot of American history from it. There were movies on Paul Revere, the Boston Tea party, all the pieces of the birth of the U.S.. It was an important part of my personal education. Mr. Disney apparently felt that was important for kids, and I thank him for it. And it occurred to me, watching John Adams, that most of today’s younger generation has no idea that there’s any American history that pre-dates World War II. There are no movies, TV shows or other material that talk about Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Ben Franklin, the Declaration of Independence, none of it. It would seem it’s become taboo. The real truth is probably less insidious – it just ain’t sexy.

At a time in our history when our nation is so divided, I think it of monumental importance that we remember, and focus on, what we all have in common – our shared experience, our common identity as Americans. I honestly think there as so few people out there, people beneath my age group, that really understand where this country came from, and what such an extraordinary group of men went through to give us this nation, and the free government, that we take for granted today. I still believe (as unpopular as this opinion has become) that we’re the greatest nation on Earth, and that we have so much to be grateful for…despite all our whining and hand-wringing and editorializing. Patriotism is not a dirty word. It is, though, a seemingly FORGOTTEN word. People have attached things to it that make it unsavory. But it is a virtue. I believe this. I believe that we can acknowledge our problems with a mindset of our ability to overcome them, if we look back at our history and see all the obstacles we’ve overcome to get this far. That we have come so far should be a matter of both pride and humility (the two can exist together), and a motivator to take what we have and raise it to even greater levels. We have cause to celebrate the great American experiment, and to embrace it, and make it relevant for our times. And it is, now, more than ever. We need to remember that.

I applaud Mr. Hanks for daring to remind us of this, to dust off the languishing tales of our beginnings and bring them back into focus. Like it or not, our stories (television and movies) have become our educators, and the means through which the masses learn about their world. I can’t imagine this was an easy sell to HBO (where it seems every series they makes needs to have the word “sexy” attached to it somewhere), but they took a chance on it, and I’m grateful to them for this, too. I can only hope this is the beginnings of a resurgence of interest in early U.S. history, and that today’s viewers will be able to experience these stories the way I did, and have the same fascination and pride in our founding fathers that I grew up with. Time will tell.

Indy Watch

This is ridiculous. I'm actually not in bed yet, and it's 2:00am. And it's because of Indiana Jones.

If you didn't know this, the first official showing of the new Indiana Jones film will be tomorrow (today, I guess, since it's 2:00am...) at the Cannes Film Festival. That's when reviews will finally come out. That's when we might have a good idea whether...well, whether it's going to rock or suck. Or somewhere in between ("ruck"?).

I really didn't think I cared about this anymore. I thought I'd just resigned myself to "Well, Lucas came up with the story, so that means it's probably going to stink, but maybe Spielberg can save it some". I was planning on low expectations. And I'm going, one way or the other, next Saturday night, so really, do I even want to know what others are saying?

Yeah. Apparently, I do. Because I'm hitting "refresh" on different web sites, trying to find the first news. I don't even have them time difference figured out, or what time they're showing the film, so I don't know how soon I'll get the news. But all of a sudden tonight, I'm obsessed with knowing, and I'm doing something I really resist doing (because it erodes my faith in humanity) and reading message boards. I know there was supposed to have been a bad review on Ain't It Cool News last week (though...isn't the film NOT supposed to be showing until today/tomorrow?). But now, a very recent posting on both the Rotten Tomatoes board and the AICN boards show a link to the first newspaper review, from the Times in London, Sunday edition. Scope this headline:

Crack! Indiana Jones takes whip to doomsayers

Ignore all the gossip, the new Indiana Jones film is worth the wait, says John Harlow in the first newspaper review


That seems to be from someone at Cannes (so wait...does that means it's been shown? Or WHAT?). And that's fantastic news. However, that means all I've got to base things on are ONE bad review and ONE good review. This is not a good scientific sampling. The suck part of this is that even as early as earlier today/yesterday, I really didn't care that much. Now, all of a sudden, this is really important to me. Now I just HAVE to know. Now, suddenly, there's a chance that maybe Lucas WON'T destroy another piece of my childhood. It was almost easier just assuming it was going to suck. Having this spark of hope, now, is worse. Now I'm emotionally invested. Now I'm daring to dream. Cynicism's always easier, isn't it? Maybe that's why it's so popular. But it's also a useful defense mechanism. You can't break my heart, mean old world, if I keep it locked away and out of the sunlight. Is having hope better? Or is expecting everything in life to suck mightily and being pleasantly surprised when something doesn't the smarter way to go?

This time of night, I have no answer, and it doesn't matter anyway. Within a matter of hours, I'll know one way or the other. And you know what? I will NOT share the news here. I would imagine many people DON'T want to know in advance, and just want to go into the film cold and make up their own mind. Power to ya! One way or the other, I'll not only know, but I'll be going with a big group of people next Saturday night to see it. So I think I'll save the verdict - that of the critics, and that of myself - until next weekend, and will write all about it then.

So now, I'd better get to sleep and stop looking for news that isn't there yet. Let's just all hope that we get ourselves in Indy film worth watching, one with a lot of action, adventure, laughs, and an agreeable stuntman-to-CGI ratio. I could use a little Indy magic this summer. Fingers crossed.

And if it all goes wrong, be sure to pick yourself up this new shirt from Dr. O's House of "T". May come in handy.

UPDATE: Damnit! Second review just went up...and it's another good one! How the hell am I supposed to sleep now?! They're starting to come in! AAIIEEE!!!

I think I've got a seven-year-old bottle of Ambien under the sink. Wonder if that would help?

Saturday, May 17, 2008

Joss is back!! Next year...

In case you haven't heard the news, my main man, my creative inspiration, creator o' stuff like Buffy, Angel and Firefly, JOSS WHEDON is coming back to TV! In a bizarre move, considering what the network did to him on Firefly, he's back with Fox, and putting together a new show that he's co-producing with Buffy alum Eliza Dushku, who's also starring in it. The show is called Dollhouse, and they came up with it and announced it, like, three days before the writers strike began (oops!). Once all that passed, they got started, and the new show is on the way.

Just not this fall.

It got pushed back to being a mid-season show, so we won't be seeing it until the wintery times of 2009, but I'm sure it'll be more than worth the wait. Joss...back on television!! I thought I'd never see such a thing again.

And what's this show about? Uh...you watch this TRAILER and you tell ME. It looks very original, very intriguing, very ass-kicky, and I can't wait to fall in love with it so Fox can quickly cancel it and break my heart all over again! Woo hoo!!!

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Dr. O's House of "T"

So I started thinking of more shirts I wanted to make for myself, and decided I might as well put them up for sale, too, as they come to me. So the official tee shirt store of michaeloconnell.com is now open, and is known as Dr. O's House of "T". I'm just going to keep adding them as they come to me. If you feel like buying one, go for it. You'll notice that they're all black tee shirts with white text. That's because I'm mainly making them for me, and I LIKE black tee shirts. But you can mess with the customization before purchase and make it any color you darned well please. So check 'em out, and feel free to keep checking back there, as I'm sure I'll keep on making them...right until I start getting a few "cease and desist" letters from 20th Century Fox...

Monday, May 12, 2008

Only funny if you've seen "Sarah Marshall"...

Every year, when I start thinking about the upcoming trip to San Diego for Comic-Con, I tell myself that I'm going to make myself some custom tee shirts to wear. And every year I forget about it until it's Con time.

This year, I finally decided to check out Zazzle.com, which I always assumed was time-consuming and complicated to use. Anything but. I created my first tee shirt, since it was just text only, in minutes. And now I just have to order it up before Con time.

You can check out the front and back here, but as the title suggests, this is only funny to people who've seeing "Forgetting Sarah Marshall". So if you're suddenly feeling left out...perhaps you ought to get out and see the movie! You will SO want this tee shirt!

Sunday, May 11, 2008

About time for a new Nicole update, isn't it?

Guess I was behind on checking my email, because I just found, like, forty of them from my site assistant, Nicole. Apparently she was not pleased with not having been heard from for some time. So check out the main page for a new update from her. Please. I think she needs the validation. And validation = less chance that I have to give her a raise at her next review.

America Feels the Need. The Need...for Iron.

Okay, I don't have any serious personal reason to bag on Speed Racer here, since I haven't even seen it, but I still feel the need to gloat at the fact that Iron Man, on its SECOND weekend, raked in over $50 million at the box office, while on its OPENING weekend, Speed Racer pulled in a comparatively LAME $20.2 million. Not only did it make less than half of what I.M. did after I.M. had already made its big money, but it BARELY beat the seemingly (if you've seen the trailer or read any review) lame-ass What Happens in Vegas. Seeing as Speed had a budget of $120 million, DON'T imagine we'll be seeing a sequel on that one.

It's not so much gloating as it is a sense of relief - relief that, for once, things are working in Hollywood as they're supposed to. Iron Man is still running at 92% on the Tomatometer. If 92% of critics like a movie, THAT should be the movie that makes the most money. Speed, after jumping from the 20s to the 30s, has evened out at 35%. If only 35% of critics like your movie (which would suggest that 65% think it was total smeg), your movie should be PUNISHED. It should not make money, the studio should get very sad and cry, and the studio should then learn an important lesson - if you blow it, we won't come. Therefore, studios will (slowly) realize that to make money, they need to MAKE GOOD MOVIES.

Sadly, this rarely happens, and without checking a review and just being mesmerized by shiny trailers, people flock to see big-budget poodoo. Then the studio execs rejoice and have martinis and clap each other on the back, and immediately green-light "Poodoo II: Even Bigger Poodoo". Meanwhile, awesome scripts don't get bought because the studio has spent all their money buying a $20 million script cranked out by a trained (but mentally challenged) monkey and the other $80 million on Jim Carrey's salary.

But at least for one glorious week in the always unpredictable summer movie season, justice has been done. The better film got the money. The big stinker got reamed. Way to go, America. There's hope for you yet. Now if you can just stop caring about what Paris Hilton had for dinner and watching Celebrity Breast Enhancement, we might actually start making some progress.

Thursday, May 8, 2008

No, Speed Racer! NO!

Sorry to my fellow SacFilmFans, but I'm afraid I am BOOKED this weekend and won't be able to go out and feed my need for Speed. So no organization coming from me. I'm afraid you's all on your own (that wasn't a typo. I was trying to be NewYorky. No points awarded for pointing out that I can't pull off the accent).

And to be honest, with how the reviews are looking so far? Hmmm... I'm getting the vibe that if you're not a 10-year old (or have one), it's not for you. And I'm hearing a lot of Cloverfield-esque whining about people getting close to going BLORF!! in the middle of the film. Too much motion and color. Many headaches reported.

Will I end up seeing it? Not sure. There's a part of me that's just curious from a purely visual point of view. I want to see what this big acid trip looks like on a big ol' screen, even if it ends up being a bad trip. But, not this weekend, at least.

So if you're going...have fun, and let me know what you think. Me, I'll be A) working and B) hitting friend and family things all over town. But I'll be driving to them all REALLY FAST, so maybe I'll get some of the experience. I, too, am a demon on wheels...

Monday, May 5, 2008

I'm Not a Violent Person. However...

...I may have to smack:

...the next guy who not only accepts a MySpace webcam stripper's friend invite, but who then posts a "Thanks for the add, gorgeous!" comment on her page like he's just scored.

...the next girl who puts either "Dance like there's no one watching" or "Don't you wish your girlfriend was hot like me?" as her MySpace quote.

...the next girl who posts, as her main MySpace pic, a shot of her and a group of, like, eight girls, and then does the same with all her pics. Let me guess...you're the one with the mustache... Come on! It's your page! Put your photo up! Be the girl with the mustache! Magnum P.I. is selling really well on DVD right now. RIDE that nostalgia wave and make it work for you, girlfriend!

...the next guy who posts as his MySpace pic a shot of him with his friend's wife or girlfriend, because 1) it makes him look "in demand" and 2) that's the only female that's gotten that close to him other than in an elevator.

...the next person who prefaces their turning on of a lamp by saying "Let there be light" or "Let's shed a little light on the subject". Oh, you're SLAYING me, dude! I haven't heard that one since Amos n' Andy were still on the radio!

...the next person who refers to Shakespeare as "The Bard".

...the next person who purposely takes something pretentious to read into a coffee place so people will notice. Oh, I see, you just HAPPENED to have that copy of "Atlas Shrugged" on you and got a hankering for some beanage. Yeah. It could happen.

...the next screenwriter who types any of the following as dialogue:

"That's gonna leave a mark."

"That's gotta hurt."

"When you're right, you're right...and you're right."

"Let's kick some butt." (Any kids' sports (or ninja) movie made since 1992).

"Let's rock!"

"You're not worth it."

...the next person who forwards me a bogus virus warning that was debunked back in 1995.

...the next person who excitedly tries to point out that that joke on the animated show they're watching could ONLY be for grownups! Kids wouldn't get it! Okay, look...YOU LIKE CARTOONS. Accept it. Embrace it. Be one with your inner child.

...Joel Schumacher. Just in general.

...Noel or Liam Gallagher. Whichever one's closest.

...your mother. No, not yours. Sorry. I was talking to Noel and Liam.

...Pamela Anderson, but only because she seems to like it, and I think it might give me a better shot with her...

...anyone who's ever said "It was better than the first one!" about a movie sequel. When has it EVER been better than the first one? Okay, there was "Wrath of Khan"...

...anyone who thinks "The Royal Tenenbaums" was stupid, yet thinks "Mrs. Doubtfire" is the funniest movie ever made.

...the next person who says, "'Serenity'? Wasn't that the movie with John Cusack and Kate Beckinsale?"

...the next person who feels the need to verbally identify the origin of a pop culture reference. Like, if person "A" says to me, "I took my kids to the petting zoo last weekend", and I put a pinky to my lip and say, "An EVIL petting zoo?", and person "B" chimes in and says, "Ah! Austin Powers!" Um...yes. It was. Glad you saw it. But pointing out that you know where it comes from doesn't make you look hip...it makes you look like you're happy you finally GOT a pop culture reference for a change. And it then makes the joke not funny. You want to join in and look "down", the next words out of your mouth should be "And at that petting zoo, did they have SHARKS with frickin' LASER BEAMS on their heads?" NOW you're getting it. Don't be lame...get in the game!

...anyone who makes up crappy rhyming catch phrases like I just did.

...Lou Diamond Phillips, for doing the same to his girlfriend (smacking her, I mean, not making up a crappy rhyming catch phrase...). Come on, man. It's not her fault your agent can only get you jobs on Sci Fi Channel original movies these days, so don't take it out on her. Loser.

...the next religious person who says, "Ah, but what does this Bible verse REALLY mean?" If for no other reason than to see if they'll turn the other cheek.

...any fan of Dennis Rodman. As a ball player. You want to appreciate his acting work, fine. "Double Team" got me kind of misty, too...

...the next girl who gets the MySpace comment "baby u so fukin hott!!" and is actually flattered by it.

...Mariah Carey. It might not help, but you never know until you try.

...the next person who misuses the word "literally".

"So I told my Dad about the car, and he LITERALLY exploded!!"

"So there are pieces of your Dad all over the floor, then?"

"Huh?"

LITERALLY means it ACTUALLY HAPPENED. If you can't use it, don't abuse it. Damnit! It just slipped out...

...the next person who comes up to me and Tim at an autograph signing and tries to get a job. Dude, we're a company of TWO...and we can't even get our OWN comic out.

...any rabid fan of Kevin Smith, Jim Rome or Howard Stern. Being a fan of theirs does not make you like them, or smarter, cooler, or less of a loser than you really are.

...the next guy who's been married so long that when he belches in a group of other guys, he says, "Oh, excuse me!" in a panic. Dude. You're with GUYS. She's not here. Let it fly! Enjoy being a guy again for those couple of hours before you have to go home and she makes you watch "Dancing with the Stars" with her and put on those jean shorts and belt she makes you wear.

...anyone who spouts a bumper sticker slogan in a political discussion in lieu of having an opinion of their own.

...the Wachowski brothers on any day on or after May 7, 2003.

...George Lucas on any day on or after May 25, 1983.

...Joan and/or Melissa Rivers, but I'd have to stand in a long line, and I don't have that kind of time.

...the entire nation of France. I'll make the time.

...anyone who defends Michael Jackson, specifically with the phrase, "No, you just don't understand Michael! He's like Peter Pan!" Hmm. I don't remember the part in Peter Pan where Pete laid the bad touch on the Lost Boys. Must have been some pages missing from my copy.

...Rita Cosby. Oh my GOD that is the most annoying woman to ever pretend to do TV news. I hear that husky voice sometimes in my darkest nightmares...

...myself for writing long blog entries when I have other work to do. Ow!

(This blog entry was reprinted from my MySpace blog, which I just realized few people have ever read. I'm much less snarky and bitter since then...)

Iron Man - Pure (Red and) Gold

They did it.

They actually did it.

They made it NOT suck.

I went out and caught the long-awaited (by many of us) Iron Man movie with a big group of friends Saturday night, and we sat through it in a sold-out theater. The fact that it was sold-out was reflected in entertainment headlines Sunday morning, talking about the film’s $100m opening weekend, the second-biggest non-sequel opening for a film in history, only behind the first Spider-Man film. There are a lot of movies that come close to that kind of money when they open. But the big difference? A lot of those movies SUCK. People rush to see them, due to all their hype, without ever thinking to glance at a review, and are surprised when they walk out in what I like to call the “daze of suckness” – that feeling of confusion in the movie-going mind that says, “But…the trailers made it look good…and all the commercials made me feel like I’d be a big loser if I DIDN’T see it…” Boned by Hollywood again, and fed another Pirates sequel. Tsk tsk.

The difference with the Iron Man movie? The reviews were in the day before it hit theaters, and it quickly became (and I quote) “the best-reviewed film of 2008”. Yes, I know, “You Don’t Mess with the Zohan” is still pending, but so far, so good. In other words? It did not suck. It did, in fact, rock. In all the right ways.

I’m a super-hero fan. Always have been. And I’ve always been a big fan of Iron Man, ever since I started reading super-hero comics. As the big super-icons go, he’s really not all that well-known. Everyone knows your Superman, your Batman, your Spider-Man… But Marvel’s Iron Man character has really never hit the big “household name” board. But for me, reading those comics as a kid? He was the COOLest. Why? Well, a couple of reasons. The main one was that the guys like Superman and Spider-Man had super-powers. To be like them, I’d either have to be an alien or get bit by a radioactive spider. Batman didn’t have powers, true, but he did have years of martial arts and other such cool training. But Iron Man? He wore a suit. He wore a suit of powered armor, one that let him fly and be super-strong and all kinds of other cool stuff. And that meant if *I* put on that same suit, *I* could have all those powers – and I’d still be just me! This made being a super-hero not some fanciful dream, but an option (assuming someone built a suit like that…it could happen…). Not being from Krypton and not having my parents murdered in front of me, I connected with this much more. Plus, even as a kid, I understood that Tony Stark, the man in the suit, was no Clark Kent. He was an imperfect guy. I know, people talk about the human side of other supers. Peter Parker has to keep a job and try to have a love life just like the rest of us! Bruce Wayne has all kinds of parental issues he still hasn’t gotten over after, like, 30 years! Okay, Tony Stark was an ALCOHOLIC, dude. That was not something you saw in your typical comic book super-hero. Which was what made him so cool. He was a flawed hero in a much more real-world kind of flawed. Not many of us know people trying to avenge their parents’ murders. Most of us have at least one alcoholic in the family. The combination of technology (instead of fantasy) and identifiable humanity made him, and his world, much more real to me. And, yes, with me growing up a poor kid, reading about a guy who’s a billionaire playboy was pretty damned appealing guy escapism, too.

They’ve been trying to make this film for years, a film I’ve both coveted and feared. Digging Iron Man as I always have, I’ve envisioned so many ways that they could screw up a film adaptation. Bad effects would be one, for sure (which is what made it such a good thing that the film wasn’t made ten or twenty years ago). Another would be casting. I had naturally assumed that Hollywood would be sadly predictable and stick some pretty-boy O.C. reject actor in the Tony Stark role. Suddenly, Tony would become 21-years old, a bratty prince of industry with no aspirations beyond his Hiltonesque front-page social life, a disappointment to his wealthy father (who, in this retelling of the origin, would still be alive and tiredly disappointed in his son)…until his father is murdered, see, and Tony designs an armored suit to avenge him! Yeah! Ugh. I knew they would completely ignore the real origin and try to make something more “in tune” with the TRL generation. And it would make a lot of money. Yet, it would blow. Blow like Dizzy Gellespie at Carnegie Hall.

So when I heard one was finally coming, I prepared for the worst. But then, to my amazement, I heard that they’d pulled Jon Favreau to direct it. Wait…say WHAT? Did they mean MY boy Favreau? He and I go way back (though he doesn’t know that). I’ve been a fan of his since his first real hit on the radar when he wrote, produced and starred in “Swingers”. And then after writing and directing “Made” (a film that apparently only I, as one of his best friends (though he doesn’t know that), loved), he created and hosted the single greatest talk show in television history, “Dinner for Five” on IFC. He went on to slightly more commercial success in a couple of directorial offerings (neither of which I saw, oddly, but as his friend, I’m just going to assume they were good), “Elf” and “Zathura”. You put all this together, and it does NOT spell “hand him Iron Man!”. And yet they did. And I couldn’t have been happier. I immediately thought of “Bourne Identity”, an action/spy movie that, for no good reason, they handed to “Swingers” director Doug Liman. And Dougie NAILED it, and brought such a wonderful indie film sensibility to what could have been an assembly-line action film that it rose above its genre and became something unique and wonderful (and managed to do justice to one of my all-time favorite novels). I immediately started seeing Jon doing the same.

And then came the casting news. Comic fans have always had this game they play – you grow up debating with your friends over who the best actor would be to play Captain America or Green Lantern. But in the age of comic movies actually getting made (and actually getting real stars in them), the debate has become much more relevant. Many Iron fans over the years have cast their vote (amongst their peers and on message boards) about who could play the best Tony Stark. I don’t, however, ever remember someone jumping up and excitedly blurting out “Robert Downey Jr.! He’d be perfect!” No one saw that coming. And I like to think most long-time fans of the I.M. had the same reaction I did. Their brain first went “Huh?” and started mounting its defense and counter-proposal. But then it paused, and pondered, and realized two important things – first, that he was perfect for the role, and second (and most importantly), that they (Marvel) were going to take this film seriously. And that’s all comic-to-film fans ever ask.

I’m not going to get into the whole “he’s a recovering addict and Tony Stark’s an alcoholic!” thing because, frankly, I’m thinking Robert Downey is so sick of hearing that the past couple of years that he’s probably started using again just to spite us. Let’s just say, instead, that they decided to choose a seasoned, amazing and versatile actor, and one of a post-MTV age group to my complete surprise, and immediately added credibility and a sense of “real” to the film. That’s the secret of fantastical films. Yes, you’re telling stories about some far-fetched stuff, but if you inject enough reality into it, it makes it so much more real for people. Good actors being life to films. Good directors make them do it even better. So now, I knew I had both a lead actor and a director that I knew, respected and loved, coming into a film I’ve been waiting to see since the late 70s. I was pretty psyched – but cautiously. We’ve all been screwed on deals like this before. I’m not mentioning names here, but GEORGE LUCAS (cough, cough), excuse me. There are some things that you THINK are a sure thing, that no one could possibly screw up. Again, no names (cough), but some creators have shown us that even in situations where it seems you have to go out of your way and work REALLY hard to screw up, it can happen. So I was hopeful, but nervous.

Wait’s over, and it was one that was so worth it.

In spirit of my spoiler-free lifestyle (see my previous post if you’re not sure what a “spoiler” is), I’m not going to sit here and summarize the film for you. I’m just going to tell you how I felt about it, and why I think you’ll feel the same. They did, in fact, take it seriously. They did not inject it with the expected cheese that seems to permeate most every comic film (biff! Socko! Pow!), and they did not make it for kids. And yet, it’s a movie that kids can totally enjoy. Several people I went with brought their kids to our viewing, and all ages had a great time. This is what George Lucas managed to forget in his senility. Kids are going to see the films ANYway. There’s lasers and explosions and crap in them! Of course they will! So why not NOT alienate half your audience and try to make something that adults can enjoy? Dumbing down insults everyone, grown-ups and kids alike.

And Favreau did not dumb it down. He made it entertaining, suspenseful, and witty instead of “wacky”. He gave us a lot of action, but he actually took his time with the film and didn’t panic every time there was a scene with no missiles or bullets in it. I found myself loving the relaxed pace, which I know probably made a few (very few, based on the reviews) viewers whine about wanting him to “get to the action!”. Not me. I felt like he invited me into the world of this film and took his time showing me around instead of rushing me from room to room, opening door after door and letting me peek in, then slamming them shut and hurrying me to the next one. I really like a film that knows how to take its time. Not drag, mind you. There’s a difference. The difference is understanding how pacing works and using it properly. Favreau did.

The rumors are true – Robert Downey owned this movie, and it’s now near impossible imagining anyone else being Tony Stark. He played cockiness without becoming a prick, he handled the comedic moments like he was (masterfully) playing a piano whose keys produced laughs, knowing just when to tone it down and when to hit the crescendos, and he brought a child-like vulnerability to a middle-aged character coming to terms with the face in the mirror and his place in the world. You believed him. You understood Tony Stark. And he made you want to BE Tony Stark.

The technology being used in the movie was JUST slightly over-the-top – some of it obviously not QUITE there with our current tech, but, really, not that far off, either. Most of it didn’t seem too out of this world. It all made sense. It interested me, in other words, instead of insulting me. It made me think “cool!” instead of “yeah, right”. As Iron Man is heavily a tech-based mythos, this had to be handled properly, and they obviously put a lot of work into making that happen. Well done.

The whole cast worked great together, from major characters down to minor ones. Putting Jeff Bridges in the film really upped its cred for me, too, as I’ve been a huge fan of that guy for many years. Gwyneth really did a fine job, and I’ll admit, she had me nervous, mostly after seeing her befuddled performance in “Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow”. Everyone else in that film seemed to be having a great time playing on a green-screen set, whereas she just looked lost and not sure where to look. She did a fine job as Tony’s assistant “Pepper” (I can’t believe they actually stuck to the old Iron Man comic name of “Pepper Potts”. I thought for sure they’d change it, but guess they gave it up for the fans). She was a lot of fun. And I have to admit, I really had NO idea who Terrance Howard was, the guy who ended up cast as one of the coolest Iron Man mythos characters ever, Jim “Rhodey” Rhodes. I pulled him up on IMDB and realized I’d somehow managed to miss pretty much EVERY film he’s ever been in – and there have been some pretty big ones (“Crash”, “Hustle and Flow”, “Ray”, “Idlewild”), so I figured they probably cast him for a reason. They sure did. Great job, pulled off a great Rhodey…and that’s coming from an old-school Rhodey fan.

What really made this film happen was what happened behind the scenes, and I don’t think a lot of people knew this. This was the first film from Marvel Studios. Until now, all films of Marvel’s characters have been made through the bigger studios. And this has always meant that the studio has had creative control. What happens when the studio gets control is things like the Batman franchise. It started off pretty cool. And then the downward spiral happened, with more studio demands and their insistence on some terrible casting choices, awful writers and directors, and, with the final one of the Joel Schumacher era, “Batman and Robin”, we saw ultimate price of money-minded morons making creative decisions. A big, silly, horrible mess. More recently, we saw this with the Fantastic Four movies. Fun? Kind of, some people would argue. They weren’t as bad as Joel Schumacher Batman movies, but they still were pretty far from great (or even good, frankly). Studios do not care about the characters. They don’t care about the fans of the characters that have been around for decades. They want to make something as loud and colorful and explosive as possible and throw enough hype around it to get folks to crowd the theaters all summer to find out, for themselves, how badly the whole thing got jacked.

With the introduction of Marvel Studios, Marvel is now making their own films – and therefore, all their own choices – with their catalogue of characters. Iron Man is the perfect representation of why this works. Marvel actually cares about their characters, believe it or not. And, apparently, they listen to their fans, as they very much did during the creation of the Iron Man movie. Jon Favreau had a MySpace page up where he invited input from fans, and believe me, he got plenty of it. And Marvel, in turn, listened to it, and the result ended up being what is, so far – and by Rotten Tomatoes rating standards – the best-reviewed super-hero movie ever. They were able to put people behind the project that really loved and respected Iron Man, and it clearly showed in the end result. And instead of a big mess, they made a film that not only is critically-praised and loved by audiences, but is making a HUGE load of money. Everybody wins. All it took was getting the studio hands off of it. Instead of a Daredevil, Electra, Punisher or (ugh) Ghost Rider, they created a film that people love, and are going to love seeing again and again. And they created a franchise that’s going to last a long time. You just watch what’s going to happen when Iron Man 2 hits the theaters in 2010 (and it’s now going to). Box office numbers that are going to make the studios green (like a Goblin) with envy.

And the results have already borne fruit. The announcement came down just today. Marvel is now going to be making not only the Iron Man sequel, but their own Thor, Captain America and Avengers movies over the next four years. There’s no guarantee, of course, that they’re going to be a great as Iron Man, but their announcement of Matthew Vaughn, director of the heralded “Layer Cake”, as the director of the “Thor” film is a fantastic sign, and a promise from Marvel that they’re going to do their best to make films that make big cash AND do justice to their properties. It’s a great time to be a geek, let me tell you.

So yes, if you haven’t, get out there and try Iron Man, the hands-down best summer movie thus far and the one all the rest will be judged by, this summer and for summers to come. It’s a hell of a ride, a hell of a good time, and will make you want to strap on a metal suit and go out flying over Malibu yourself. Thanks Jon. Thanks Robert. And thanks, Marvel, for hearing us. We plan to show our gratitude, believe me. With our love AND our coin.

Sunday, May 4, 2008

Spoilers Bad! Common Sense Good!

I remember once, when my stepbrother was in his early teens, being in the other room while he and a friend were in the living room watching “The Empire Strikes Back”. Apparently his friend had never seen it (this younger generation. What can you do?). As they watched it, I started hearing my stepbrother making statements like this:

“Oh, dude, watch this. He’s about to cut off his hand.”

“Oh, here it comes! He’s about to tell him he’s his father!”

Basically, before anything remotely cool or notable would come up, my stepbrother would, about ten to twenty seconds before it happened, enthusiastically tell his friend exactly what was going to go down.

These are called “spoilers”.

This is also a very extreme example of them. My stepbrother was young, and yet to realize what it was he was doing. It was called RUINING THE FILM FOR THE OTHER GUY. He’s older and wiser now, don’t worry.

If you’ve heard the term “spoilers” thrown around on the internet, this is what the term is used for. It’s when someone reveals a surprise or plot point for you in a movie, TV show, book, etc., and therefore “spoils” it for you – or, keeps you from experiencing the pleasure of discovering it yourself. Imagine Christmas morning coming up, and you’ve got these big wrapped boxes with your name on them under the tree, and you have no idea what’s inside them. The anticipation and the mystery give you that wonderful thrill – the excitement of not knowing, all the possibilities running through your mind of what each could contain. Now imagine two days before Christmas, your sister sees you eying the boxes and says, “Oh, I saw them wrapping those. You’re getting a fire truck, a basketball, a fishing pole and an iPod.” Well, okay, now you don’t have to wonder anymore. But aren’t you going to feel a little left out on Christmas morning when all your siblings are opening their gifts with such excitement, dying to find out what’s inside, and you already know what’s inside yours? Your sister, perhaps just a little high on having insider information and wanting the thrill of being the first one to tell, has stolen something precious from you. She “spoiled” your Christmas morning.

When it comes to my entertainment, I do NOT want spoilers. I’m old enough—and wise enough, thank you—to know that what draws you into a story, what really connects you to it and where the real enjoyment comes from…from not knowing what’s going to happen next. That joy of discovery is what keeps us on the edge of our seats, the thrill of the unknown. If you hear me saying that I “can’t wait to see what happens next episode!”, that’s really just a figure of speech. I, in fact, CAN wait, and am enjoying the wait. And if you, for some reason, know what’s going to happen and then tell me? It’s going to piss me off.

Different people have different personal definitions of what a spoiler is. When it comes to an upcoming, highly-anticipated film, some people want the opening night experience to be so pure that they want to go totally “black” on it. They don’t want to watch any movie trailers. They don’t want to see promotional photos. They don’t want to read reviews. They want to know NOTHING about it, so that every frame of the film becomes an exciting journey of discovery. I know people who will literally close their eyes, plug their ears and hum when a film trailer comes on in the theater for an upcoming movie they don’t want to be spoiled on. That, or they’ll get up and walk out of the theater and come back after the offending trailer is over. To some people, it’s that serious. And I both understand and respect that.

Some people want a little bit of information – just a taste, just a tease – but without getting TOO much. Usually a well-made film trailer will provide this for them. Preferably, this trailer will give a few selected scenes, ones that give a good general idea of what to expect from the film (a few quick action shots, some clips that show who the characters are, a couple of the gags to show whether or not the film has a good sense of humor or if its jokes are tired and lame), but doesn’t give away the whole plot…and at the VERY least doesn’t give away the ending. There’s a reason why trailers are often called “teasers”. That’s the idea. They’re meant to entice you into needing to go experience that film and see how it all turns out. Poorly-made film trailers usually end up looking like two-minute summaries of the film. They give away the whole plot from start to finish. Have you ever had that experience? I’ve often seen one of those in the theater and then turned to the person I came with and whispered, “Well, now I don’t have to bother seeing THAT movie since I just SAW the whole movie…”. Again, trailers are meant to tease – not to spoil.

Me, I like to know as little as possible. When it comes to movies, I’m okay with a film trailer. I understand that there’s a difference between hearing that there’s some new kung-fu cyborg movie coming out and actually seeing scenes showing the badass kung-fu cyborgs fighting on top of the Statue of Liberty while F-16s zoom overhead. I like a little foreplay. These scenes then get me more excited about seeing the film and, therefore, I enjoy the anticipation more. Though sometimes even just the right movie poster can do that for me, and I can then do without the trailer.

When it comes to my TV shows, though, I want NOTHING. This is assuming it’s a TV show I already watch, of course. I already know I love and want to watch the show, so I don’t need any other enticements. So when it comes to that next episode coming up, there’s no need to show me what to expect. I’ll be watching it anyway, so why should I ruin the surprise? This is why I never watch “Next time on…” teasers at the end of TV shows. Even if (especially if, as a matter of fact) the current episode just ended with a huge cliffhanger. If I just saw someone point a gun at Dave the stockbroker and we heard a gunshot and got a “To be continued” as we cut to black, why would I want to watch scenes from next week showing Dave walking around still alive? Now I know he made it, so the tension (hence, the fun) is all gone.

Avoiding spoilers is a tricky business. You have to turn the channel if you need to. You have to tell people at work who start telling you about last night’s “Lost” to stop right there because you didn’t have time to watch it and plan to watch it later that evening on your DVR. But the most dangerous place for spoilers in this day and age is the internet. A large part of this problem directly relates to the majority of the people USING the internet being complete clueless morons.

There are zero secrets in the internet age. You just can’t keep one longer than a few minutes. If it’s a secret a fair amount of people are interested in, someone will find out the answer and start spreading it all over the web. Studios now go through ridiculous lengths to keep the screenplays for their in-production films from leaving the set. But inevitably, someone will swipe one and post it on the internet. And then fans of whatever movie is being made will read it and start discussing and dissecting it on message boards and blogs. Like those kids who sneak through the family closets to find their birthday gifts early, people on the web are addicted to knowing everything in advance – more to the point, with being the first one to know everything so they can lord this knowledge over other people. I really don’t understand this. If there’s a new Matrix movie coming out in six months that you’re really, really excited about seeing, why would you get and read the script ahead of time? Yes, there’s that temporary thrill of feeling like an insider, and feeling special for knowing what everyone else doesn’t, but don’t people realize that when the big opening night happens in sixth months, they’re going to be sitting in the film they’ve waited so long for, knowing every single thing that’s about to happen? They’re robbing themselves and, no matter how many times they go through the experience, don’t seem smart enough to realize it.

If you want to do that to yourself, of course, that’s your business. It’s when you mess with me that I take issue. I just had this happen with the Iron Man film. I’d been told that there’s a big scene that takes place after the credits that you have to stick around to see. This is not a spoiler – this is a courtesy. Knowing that there is such a scene doesn’t ruin anything – in fact, if you didn’t know it was there, you might just walk out of the theater, only to hear later that you missed this cool thing. So I appreciated knowing this, and was looking forward to finding out what this apparently very cool scene might be. And then I happened to be on a web site I frequent where someone, in the title of the blog post entry, gave away the whole scene. I was pissed. I still enjoyed the scene when I saw it, but I was robbed of being surprised by it. I’d have enjoyed it so much more if I hadn’t known the surprise that was coming. Some thoughtless jackass ruined that experience for me, and that’s something that can’t be undone.

People want to discuss films and TV shows that they’ve seen, and a great place to do that with people from all over the world is the web. And that’s awesome. But there’s a right and a wrong way to do it. The wrong way is getting on a message board and making your post title “What did it mean at the end when (major character) died and (other major character) said that his death could have been prevented?” Okay, asshead? Now everyone who hasn’t yet seen the movie now knows who’s going to DIE. Thank you! Grrrrr. Are people really that clueless? Are they so focused on their own little world that they assume that since they’ve seen a movie, everyone else must have seen the movie already, too? Sometimes they don’t blow it in their post title, but do it in the post itself. Either way, readers on the message board don’t know that the spoiler is coming. This is why a courtesy evolved on message boards called the “Spoiler Warning”. Posters, knowing that what they’re going to write may spoil something for someone who hasn’t seen the product in question, will either type “spoiler warning” or “spoiler alert” or “spoiler ahead!” in their title, or, with even more courtesy, will start their posting with something like this:

SPOILER ALERT!

SPOILER ALERT!

SPOILER ALERT!

SPOILER ALERT!

SPOILER ALERT!

SPOILER ALERT!

SPOILER ALERT!

SPOILER ALERT!

SPOILER ALERT!

SPOILER ALERT!

SPOILER ALERT!

SPOILER ALERT!

SPOILER ALERT!

This way, a reader is not only very aware that there’s a spoiler coming, and that they should proceed at their own risk, but now they can’t accidentally see the spoiler, but have to actually scroll down to get to it. This way people can discuss the ending of Cloverfield all they want with other people who already know how it ended, without ruining things for those who are still waiting to enjoy it.

Both on the web and in person, avoiding “spoilerizing” people is just common sense. When I want to talk about a previous night’s TV show at work, the first thing I’ll ask the person is whether or not they watched it. If they haven’t yet, I’ll shut up. And I’ll also not say things like “Oh, okay, I won’t tell you what happens to Steve, then, but it’s huge!” Because THAT is a spoiler. They now know that something is going to happen to Steve! They should NOT have known that. Now they’ll spend the whole episode distracted, waiting to see what’s going to happen to him. See, spoilers are tricky. Hinting at something is just as bad as coming out and revealing it. The most I’ll tell people is that it’s definitely worth watching, letting them know that it’s a good episode, and, therefore, getting them more excited to watch it. I also won’t tell them if I thought it was a BAD episode. Why? Because I understand that that’s just my opinion. They may well enjoy the episode very much – or they would have, if I hadn’t planted in their head that it was a bad episode, tainting their objectivity and making them think, in advance, that it sucks.

One of my favorite examples of a clueless spoilerizer happened at a previous job of mine. I asked a girl if she’d seen the Sixth Sense yet. If you know anything about M. Night Shyamalan movies, you know that he’s famous for his twist endings. I was being careful to get this question answered before I said anymore. If she had said no, I would have just told her it was an amazing movie that she needed to get out and see. However, she did tell me no, and then also told me that another guy at work had asked her the same question. She had told him, too, that she hadn’t. But the minute he heard that, he got excited over the fact that she didn’t know what happened and he did, and he proceeded to tell her THE ENTIRE ENDING. I wanted to find this guy and punch him. Did he not realize (apparently not) that he had just stolen something from her? How many people still remember that moment when they hit the end of that film and their jaws dropped? She’ll never know what that feels like. That chance has gone forever. This, by the way, is why it’s important to see M. Night films in the theater and as soon as possible, and not wait for DVD. I made that mistake with “The Village”, and was later innocently watching an episode of Seth Green’s “Robot Chicken”, and one of their comedy bits gave away the ending. I was kind of angry at them, but I also knew I had no one but myself to blame. You don’t wait two years to see an M. Night film. That was my own fault, and I cursed myself for it.

Never assume things when you’re telling other people about something you enjoyed. I had never read the Lord of the Rings books as a kid like so many had, so when the films started coming out, I walked into them knowing nothing about what was going to happen. That is, until I got a couple of spoilers. In both cases, the spoilerizer (a friend and a movie reviewer) made the assumption that everyone MUST have read the books before the movie came out. That’s a bad assumption (I quote that episode of “Friends” – Ross: “Didn’t you read Lord of the Rings in high school?” Joey: “No, I had SEX in high school.”). In both cases, because of both of these guys, I knew, when only the first film was out, how the third film was going to end. Did I still enjoy them? Yes. But I could have enjoyed them that much more if someone hadn’t opened my Christmas present in front of me…on the 4th of July.

If you’re one of those people who just can’t wait to find out what’s going to happen next, who needs to watch “Making Of” documentaries before the film comes out, reads the leaked shooting scripts for the rest of your show’s season, or scours the web for every possible detail before you sit down to “enjoy” the thing, that’s your business. I, personally, think you’re robbing yourself, and I think you’d realize that if you really thought about it and looked back objectively on such experiences you’ve had, but hey…you do what you want with your own entertainment journey. But please be aware that many other people don’t WANT to know what’s going to happen. They want the adventure of finding out for themselves. So please, either keep it to yourself, or give appropriate warnings before you start typing away on your blog, or talking to a group of people when there’s a chance that one or two of those people might still be waiting to discover that property that you loved so much. If you love it so much, give others the same chance to love it as much as you do, even if that means that you don’t get to beat the creators to the punch by spilling the shocking ending. Courtesy counts. Even, believe it or not, in Hollywood.